TEXT SIZE: small | larger | largest Become a KCLSU Associate Member
KCLSU logo
search web KCLSU
Advice
Campaigning
Clubs
Contacts
Course Reps
Forum
Governance
Jobs
News
Officers
Roar
Services
Societies
Volunteering
What's On
governance arrowbar
Committees Documents Elections Governance Review
governance photo header
Governance Review 2004-06: Suggested model
Findings Recommendations Model Cost

Based on the recommendations and consultation, a model was produced...

  1. Company Limited by Guarantee
    To limit liability. All students would be members. The College would hold 26% of the votes akin to a golden share. The company directors would be the KCLSU trustees. The company secretary would be the General Manager.
  2. Trustee Board
    Most senior decision making forum. Responsible for strategic and financial issues. Balance board of sabbatical officers, students and non-students. There would be a ratio of two students to one non-student.
  3. Flexible officer positions
    President plus four VPs. Roles decided every two years, but elected annually.
  4. Reconstituted SRC as Student Council
    Most senior student representative body. Makes recommendations to and scrutinises trustee board, appoints scrutiny, co-ordinates forums.
  5. Scrutiny Committees
    Review performance, make recommendations, conduct research, review decisions and performance of trustees and KCLSU.
  6. Standing Committees
    Continue but with a lighter regulatory regime. Delegated powers from the Trustee Board. Report back to the Student Council.
  7. Community Forums
    KCLSU will connect and engage with its members on their terms and communicate with students where they are based. KCLSU will consult with students and also discuss topics that students wish to raise. Other agencies in addition to KCLSU will attend.
  8. Electronic Voting
    Engage students on their terms.
Top

bottom bar